collapse

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Random Image

talesfromriverdale30

talesfromriverdale30

* Search


* Recent Topics

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Biollante: play*
    Today at 09:53:53 AM
  • Biollante: oops looks like 59 percent of african americans support gay marriage, great job conservo-think tanks, your attempt to paly minorities against eachother fell flat on its face
    Today at 09:53:30 AM
  • Steveinthecity: You should have seen the commotion caused years ago when Susan Richards was drawn with a new hairstyle.
    Today at 02:19:44 AM
  • PTF: Thor's hammer has fan club? :)
    Yesterday at 05:55:58 PM
  • Banshee: Because we fans take our favorite stuff seriously, that is why.
    Yesterday at 01:38:07 PM
  • PTF: It's a magic hammer. It doesn't have to make sense. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:00 AM
  • Steveinthecity: I wonder why it's always readers that catch mistakes with art, powers, plots, continuity, uniforms, etc. and not the creators and editors?  I hope they're not secretly laughing at us. ;)
    Yesterday at 05:09:43 AM
  • Steveinthecity: When Thor pulls the hammer back to throw, his momentum stops. He has always been able to float or hover once airborne, and he'll remain until the hammer comes back to him.  I guess the winds keep him aloft.
    Yesterday at 05:05:34 AM
  • Biollante: ok so shouldn't Joe Quesada know that? lol  It made him look a bit stupid imo.
    May 21, 2012, 07:57:37 AM
  • Jabroniville: Yeah, that's odd- Thor usually has the Hammer out in front. Though I don't think it's ever explained how he can throw it while in mid-flight and not just plummet like a goof. I wish artists would stop having him do things like that :)
    May 21, 2012, 07:23:13 AM
  • Steveinthecity: @Biolante:  Thor uses the hammer to fly. He can throw his hammer during flight and float in one spot until the hammer returns to him. Don't know what Joe Q. was thinking there. I've never seen Thor fly on his own.
    May 21, 2012, 12:59:03 AM
  • NineZero09: How the world can be...and the universe can be.
    May 21, 2012, 12:32:36 AM
  • NineZero09: I watched the annular solar eclipse, but partial at where I live.
    May 21, 2012, 12:32:21 AM
  • NineZero09: Sad to read about Donna Summer and Robin Gibb passed away.
    May 21, 2012, 12:32:05 AM
  • comicsrod: As You may know Tonight of some Sad News the Robin Gibb 1/3 members of the fame Disco Group The Bee Gees has Passed Away at the age of 62 our Hearts go out to the only Survivor Bee Gees member Barry Gibb & His Family and his Music and Hollywood Friends as we Remember the Music Superstar he will be miss very much   ROBIN GIBB 1949-2012
    May 20, 2012, 10:20:12 PM
  • Biollante: Joe Quesada was drawing Thor on some Disney promo, and he drew him flying with his hammer on his side, now I'm not a Thor junkie, but isn't that actualy inaccurate, doesn't he fly by being dragged by his hammer???
    May 20, 2012, 08:54:59 PM
  • Tuxedo Mark: R.I.P., Robin Gibb. :(
    May 20, 2012, 08:19:21 PM
  • Biollante: I'm just glad he's giving back to his fans by revisiting Blade Runner and Alien with Prometheus, I'm sure he's going to deliver too, his legacy as a film maker is on the line since those are his more iconic films
    May 20, 2012, 11:38:08 AM
  • Biollante: aesthetics*
    May 20, 2012, 10:58:08 AM
  • Biollante: gonna be hard for anyting to catch up, Ridley Scott is pretty much the top of dark visual design imo, and he drew a lot from Moebius for that film, most fillm makers are not really connected to aestheticas of good fantasy film making in the same way
    May 20, 2012, 10:55:18 AM

Author Topic: Peanuts comic strip  (Read 1611 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Biollante

Re: Peanuts comic strip
« Reply #15 on: September 15, 2011, 04:47:26 PM »
I am of mixed feelings on non-Shultz Peanuts - although I lean more towards your sentiments above.

Comic strips (and even comics) are much different than books.  A novel or even a movie is a point in time, concentrated experience. Comic series and especially strips are a "relationship" between the reader and character.  While an individual strip might be funny or not on a given day - I think the attraction to the strip is the power of visiting daily or in little "pieces".  This gives a sense of familiarity with the characters and they become much more than static cartoons and begin to live a life of their own.

Peanuts is one of the best examples of where this live was interconnected with the creator.  Peanuts IS Shultz.  Anything not done by him is an homage at best and exploration at worst.

People can't understand why the real appeal of Peanuts is to read it over time in books (or, in the past daily).  If some random person were to read a strip where Snoopy crashes as the Red Baron, or Charlie Brown actually kicks the football - it would have little impact.  If a long-time fan were to read the same strip - it would have significant impact.

In some ways, Archie comics are like this.  While they to appeal to casual readers due to their comedy, stories, etc.  They are great by themselves - together as a mosaic over time - they are even better! (in my opinion of course).

This is why I never recommend comics to my non-comic friends.  I only recommend complete graphic novels that don't require any time commitment to "get".

I think this kind of depends.  A lot of Wizard of Oz nerds consider a good deal of the post-Frank L. Baum books to be "official canon" for example.  It's all about perspective really, which is, in the end, opinion. If people think the other strips are legitimate enough, they will perceive them that way.

I could see the argument that his descendants just want to get on the gravy train.  However, I can't really blame them either in this horrible economy where corporations are too afraid to hire people while they sit on their big caches of money and resources.

Offline Pep22

Re: Peanuts comic strip
« Reply #16 on: September 15, 2011, 06:58:36 PM »
I am very fond of Peanuts, yet with all that the Schulz family seems to be greenlighting, it feels...wrong to me.  I enjoyed the Happiness is a Warm Blanket, Charlie Brown graphic novel,  but couldn't get past "This isn't by Charles Schulz".  He died 11 years ago, and didn't want anyone else to draw Peanuts, yet here is his family, betraying his dying wishes.  Online, we're seeing more and more non-Schulz Peanuts artwork.  Peanuts was very personal to him, and for someone else to continue it in a new comic book...it isn't right.  I realize that Peanuts has long since been commercialized, but Schulz was there himself to ok or turn down projects.  Without Schulz, Snoopy may as well be Mickey Mouse or Betty Boop or Hello Kitty, a cute yet meaningless image on a coffee mug.

There were Peanuts comic books by people other than Schulz published in Schulz' lifetime and with his blessing. It was the strip itself that he didn't want anyone else doing.

Here's a link to a nice history of Peanuts in comic books.

http://www.comicartville.com/peanutscomics.htm

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
14 Replies
2653 Views
Last post August 09, 2011, 03:23:43 AM
by Jabroniville
4 Replies
1146 Views
Last post September 11, 2011, 02:20:05 PM
by bellagy19
3 Replies
786 Views
Last post September 26, 2011, 01:42:44 AM
by aamrun


The Archie character names and likenesses are covered by the registered trademarks/copyrights of Archie Comic Publications, Inc. and are used with permission by this site. The Official Archie Comics website can be visited at www.archiecomics.com.