collapse

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Random Image

bettysdiary08reunionD

bettysdiary08reunionD

* Search


* Recent Topics

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Biollante: pollster*
    Today at 12:41:53 AM
  • Biollante: probalby, but 59 percent is considered a "blow out" in political terms, some people are on shaky ground right now, there was evne a conservative pollset that worked for Bush warning people that if Republicans are against things like gay marriage in the near future, they would endure catastrophic losses, I don't know if it's this political cycle, but the paradigm shift already happened a while ago
    Today at 12:41:38 AM
  • Steveinthecity: Would the survey results differ if "civil union" was used in place of "marriage"?
    Yesterday at 09:11:09 PM
  • Biollante: play*
    Yesterday at 09:53:53 AM
  • Biollante: oops looks like 59 percent of african americans support gay marriage, great job conservo-think tanks, your attempt to paly minorities against eachother fell flat on its face
    Yesterday at 09:53:30 AM
  • Steveinthecity: You should have seen the commotion caused years ago when Susan Richards was drawn with a new hairstyle.
    Yesterday at 02:19:44 AM
  • PTF: Thor's hammer has fan club? :)
    May 22, 2012, 05:55:58 PM
  • Banshee: Because we fans take our favorite stuff seriously, that is why.
    May 22, 2012, 01:38:07 PM
  • PTF: It's a magic hammer. It doesn't have to make sense. :)
    May 22, 2012, 11:54:00 AM
  • Steveinthecity: I wonder why it's always readers that catch mistakes with art, powers, plots, continuity, uniforms, etc. and not the creators and editors?  I hope they're not secretly laughing at us. ;)
    May 22, 2012, 05:09:43 AM
  • Steveinthecity: When Thor pulls the hammer back to throw, his momentum stops. He has always been able to float or hover once airborne, and he'll remain until the hammer comes back to him.  I guess the winds keep him aloft.
    May 22, 2012, 05:05:34 AM
  • Biollante: ok so shouldn't Joe Quesada know that? lol  It made him look a bit stupid imo.
    May 21, 2012, 07:57:37 AM
  • Jabroniville: Yeah, that's odd- Thor usually has the Hammer out in front. Though I don't think it's ever explained how he can throw it while in mid-flight and not just plummet like a goof. I wish artists would stop having him do things like that :)
    May 21, 2012, 07:23:13 AM
  • Steveinthecity: @Biolante:  Thor uses the hammer to fly. He can throw his hammer during flight and float in one spot until the hammer returns to him. Don't know what Joe Q. was thinking there. I've never seen Thor fly on his own.
    May 21, 2012, 12:59:03 AM
  • NineZero09: How the world can be...and the universe can be.
    May 21, 2012, 12:32:36 AM
  • NineZero09: I watched the annular solar eclipse, but partial at where I live.
    May 21, 2012, 12:32:21 AM
  • NineZero09: Sad to read about Donna Summer and Robin Gibb passed away.
    May 21, 2012, 12:32:05 AM
  • comicsrod: As You may know Tonight of some Sad News the Robin Gibb 1/3 members of the fame Disco Group The Bee Gees has Passed Away at the age of 62 our Hearts go out to the only Survivor Bee Gees member Barry Gibb & His Family and his Music and Hollywood Friends as we Remember the Music Superstar he will be miss very much   ROBIN GIBB 1949-2012
    May 20, 2012, 10:20:12 PM
  • Biollante: Joe Quesada was drawing Thor on some Disney promo, and he drew him flying with his hammer on his side, now I'm not a Thor junkie, but isn't that actualy inaccurate, doesn't he fly by being dragged by his hammer???
    May 20, 2012, 08:54:59 PM
  • Tuxedo Mark: R.I.P., Robin Gibb. :(
    May 20, 2012, 08:19:21 PM

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
General Comics / Re: Gay Wedding in Marvel comics
« Last post by Jabroniville on Today at 03:00:02 AM »
A fun link about Northstar and other gay themes in comics. The '90s page has more.

Regarding DC having an established character "come out", since they just rebooted their continuity and changed a TON of stuff, it'd be easy to just say they were gay the whole time anyways. So we don't even have to worry about going against past stuff, or even explaining the "I just realized I was gay" or "I was hiding who I was all along"- not that either aren't viable options.

Some characters could be turned gay pretty easily- anyone who reads Tim Drake & Superboy's interactions for the past fifteen-twenty years and says there's no gay subtext is BLIIIIIIIIIND :). I mean, I'm no Slash-Shipper by any means, and endless Shipping discussions tend to just annoy me when they're out of character, but when characters show THAT MUCH subtext/obsession, then I can get into it :).

Regarding Northstar, he's an interesting subject. I remember John Byrne saying he made him gay just because it could be interesting (news about homosexuality being genetic/in-born was just coming out at the time) because all the Alpha Flight characters were bland otherwise. The problem was, he was a third-tier member of a fourth-tier team (it's ALPHA FLIGHT- I'm Canadian and even *I* think they're a weak team), usually getting only the weakest writers & artists after Byrne left the book.

He got his own Limited Series in the '90s, but it was odd- it seemed clear he was gay, but nobody ever SAID IT- the big villain made an allusion to "your people don't deserve to live" but he "Could have" been talking about mutants (but wasn't). Marvel made a bit of an attempt to push this given their anti-gay policies in the '80s (which were a result of violations of the Comics Code- then a big deal, corporate pressure, fear of backlash, etc., though I'm not sure what Jim Shooter's thoughts are- he made a few weak concessions about a comic he wrote where Bruce Banner is propositioned violently in a YMCA shower by two dudes), but backed down, and DC tended to have more gays for a longer time.

Nowadays, many teams have gay members (Young Avengers was in-your-face with it- with the main couple talking about it constantly), and I wouldn't be surprised if Marvel's gay characters outnumbered DC's by a big number now. DC has the edge in high-profile characters thanks to Batwoman, but she's the only major one right now.

Is Northstar the most jerked-around character in comics? Probably not- at least he's got an X-Men run, his death was temporary (though hilariously, they actually killed him at THE SAME TIME as the Ultimate Universe Northstar) even by comic book standards, and he got his own Limited Series. There's tons of characters to never even get that chance. I mean, think of the poor fans of The Doom Patrol- they've watched that book get cancelled 90 times in the past 30 years :).

Still, he's kind of a bastard stepchild to Marvel- it's kind of too bad that the first big gay character ended up being on such a low-tier book, and with such boring powers (he's just a Super-Speed/Flight guy). If they'd gone with one of the X-Men, it could have been a big deal. Heck, the New Mutants were certainly gay enough that upgrades to the X-team wouldn't have been out of order.
2
They need to figure out new distribution ideas I guess.  Sadly even Betty and Veronica's solo titles couldn't survive int this climate I guess.
My favorite topic to rant and complain about...comics distribution.   :D
There doesn't seem to be a reasonable fix to the problem, so I just complain. No solutions from me.  :P


They really do. They need to drop this new art style too, go back to the way it was in the 90s/early 00s.
Remember when everything used to be better?  ::)
3
General Comics / Re: Gay Wedding in Marvel comics
« Last post by Steveinthecity on Today at 02:01:43 AM »
You're right about the "old days" not being particularly better across the board. I suppose the idea of "good old days" is a result of some coping mechanism we employ to filter out harsh or stressful memories.  I guess this is where "nostalgia" comes into play. We want to connect with and rekindle our fondest memories. 

As for DC, I'm hoping their move doesn't disrupt too much of the history of the character they select. I don't need everything in comics to reflect real life. I read comics for the escape and entertainment they provide me.




4
They really do. They need to drop this new art style too, go back to the way it was in the 90s/early 00s.
5
Archie 7
Betty 11 -
Veronica 9
Jughead 16
Reggie 9 +
6
They need to figure out new distribution ideas I guess.  Sadly even Betty and Veronica's solo titles couldn't survive int this climate I guess.
7
Archie 7 -
Betty 12
Veronica 9 +
Jughead 16
Reggie 8
8
General Comics / Re: Gay Wedding in Marvel comics
« Last post by Biollante on Today at 12:37:02 AM »
Quote
I realize it wasn't so much an outcry as much as it was just a large amount of attention to the Kevin introduction. There were a lot of opinion pieces where the author questioned the reasoning behind Kevin, as the brand itself has always been considered safe and a throwback to old-timey middle America values.  I didn't mean that Kevin was better known to the non-comics public, I was thinking more about the Archie brand itself.

My point on the 40 Moms thing was that it was a manufactured "controversy."  It was something planned by the idiots that run the American Family Association, possibly over a table at their headquarters when they were devising strategy and choosing things to go after.  It wasn't actually real outrage from regular people that shopped at Toys R' Us.  There's no evidence of that.  Similarly, there was no actual outrage about Ellen doing JC Penny's commercials, their other project.  It was pretty much fake.  This is why there would be no difference between Kevin Keller and Northstar.  These people aren't comic readers.  They just see a gay target.  It doesn't matter what the average age of the readers of Marvel Comics is.

I didn't come across any negative opinion pieces at all.  Probably didn't read a lot of them, but most stuff I came across seemed rather positive.  Maybe some forum rants I remember, but I never saw anything negative published apart from perhaps a Rush Limbaugh tirade via the public airwaves.

Going to examine this old-timey middle Americaa idea.  I know you're only referring to it, and you are referring to other people's opinions, not your own.  So please don't misconstrue this as me criticizing you.  I'm definitely not.  However,  I think this idea is worth examining anyways. 

Personally, the notion of a safe, old-timey Middle America is a total farce. The people that lived during those times are dead or 60-80 years old.  Also gay kids have always existed, it's just their lives were 4,000 times more horrendous during the 40's, 50's, 60's, etc.  Not to underestimate what it is like for many now.  For many friends and people I know it is/was a nightmare because their parents are bigots that don't love children unconditionally or they were terrorized in the US school system.  But lets get back to the past, these olden eras that were supposedly without gay people. 

Similar parallels can be drawn to a time when black people were lynched in a lot of old-timey, "safe" Middle America neighborhoods including up the street from here where I live in Middle America, the supposed bastion of these values that are often referenced. If you do some research, you can probably find pictures of individuals with dark skin hanging from trees in front of places that look like Pop's Chock'lit Shoppe while white skin goons with those old-timey values stand around them with smug looks on their faces.

Were these times really safe?  I'd say no, unless you were white, straight as an arrow, and followed every single rule pushed upon you from the powers that be that created the norms that controlled how such a society functioned.  I don't really think the American ideal of "freedom" really factored into this world for a lot of people.

Personally, I think the people that consider things safe that treat gay people like space aliens that should never be mentioned have serious problems with empathy, compassion, and morality.  Just my two cents on that.  Sure gay people may have not have seemed to have existed in the world of 1950, but that's probably because if you were out of the closet there was a good chance you would shortly wind up in jail or be murdered.  Good times right?

Most of the people that still think the world should be like that are 65 years old and don't have children in the targeted age demographics of Archie Comics, which why ignoring them was probably much easier than what people first assumed.

Not that I don't think retro-40's, 50's, etc. stuff is fun.  Sure, I love it.  I like going to retro diners, I like watching old movies, and I like the music.  But it's probably about as removed from the reality of every day life from back then as Westerns probably are to what the 1800's were like for the average random citizen.  Great for a setting I guess, but I don't know if wanting to keep the same mindset in regards to all those accepted norms in present time is less than barbaric.

Quote
I'm interested in the DC approach because instead of introducing a new character and letting his back story come about organically they are using an existing character. The press release used the words "major character", "re-introducing", and "he", so of course speculation is rampant. It doesn't make clear that it will be someone with super powers or in costume, so that leaves the field more open.

It seems organic to me in the way that it mirrors every day life.  Lots of people are forced to be in the closet for whatever reason until they make the personal decision to come out. This sounds pretty gutsy to me actually, maybe slightly more so than Marvel bringing an out of the closet gay character they had killed three times back to life.  Not that I want to criticize Marvel over this really.  I think they deserve credit for trying rehabilitate him in recent history.  Marvel doing something like this is very good, especially in the context of their entire history.
9
Hmmm...

Archie 8
Betty 12
Veronica 8 +
Jughead 16
Reggie 8 -
10
Archie 8 +
Betty 12
Veronica 7 -
Jughead 16+
Reggie 9+
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

The Archie character names and likenesses are covered by the registered trademarks/copyrights of Archie Comic Publications, Inc. and are used with permission by this site. The Official Archie Comics website can be visited at www.archiecomics.com.