collapse

* Random Image

cheryl05_gif
cheryl05_gif
Posted by: Tuxedo Mark
Posted in album: Cheryl Blossom

* Search


* Recent Topics

What comics have you been reading? by BettyReggie
[Today at 01:11:38 PM]


Library Books That You All Read by BettyReggie
[Today at 01:08:21 PM]


What are you listening too ? by DeCarlo Rules
[Today at 12:37:16 PM]


What have you done today? by Archiecomicxfan215
[Today at 09:10:16 AM]


Days we look foward to as Archie Fans. by BettyReggie
[August 19, 2017, 09:40:52 AM]


New Riverdale Season 2 promo "Desperate Times" by Archiecomicxfan215
[August 17, 2017, 08:27:51 PM]


Riverdale Reviewed by Tuxedo Mark
[August 16, 2017, 08:10:39 PM]


Betty and Veronica; will there be an issue 4 or is it cancelled? by DeCarlo Rules
[August 15, 2017, 11:38:17 PM]


Check Out This Jughead Article by DeCarlo Rules
[August 15, 2017, 03:34:09 PM]


Some reviews. by DeCarlo Rules
[August 12, 2017, 07:39:25 PM]

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • BettyReggie: I hope they put the new comics on Midtown Comics on Monday.
    Today at 12:04:55 AM
  • BettyReggie: I finally got Riverdale #5 in mail.
    August 19, 2017, 03:33:06 PM
  • Tuxedo Mark: LOL, Cheryl's hair deserves an Emmy: [link]
    August 19, 2017, 02:47:48 PM
  • BettyReggie: He played Ross's son Ben.
    August 18, 2017, 05:43:07 PM
  • BettyReggie: Cole Sprouse is on Friends right now
    August 18, 2017, 05:42:27 PM
  • Vegan Jughead: OK thanks Mark!
    August 18, 2017, 03:42:32 PM
  • Tuxedo Mark: Here's a list with links to all of the reviews so far: [link]
    August 18, 2017, 03:01:04 PM
  • Tuxedo Mark: Vegan Jughead: I don't post a link for each new review, but I do post a notice in the Riverdale Reviewed thread whenever a new review goes up. Just click on the link to the site in the first post of the thread (or in my signature in any of my posts), and the new review will be at the top of the front page of my blog. :)
    August 18, 2017, 02:43:45 PM
  • Vegan Jughead: Mark, make sure and post links when you get your reviews done!
    August 18, 2017, 08:40:01 AM
  • BettyReggie: I have Riverdale season #1 but I have to wait till I get new DVD player to watch it.
    August 17, 2017, 09:37:16 PM
  • Tuxedo Mark: Picked up "Riverdale" on DVD. Ripped the first disc to my hard drive and am gonna start reviewing episode 1 tomorrow. :)
    August 17, 2017, 07:51:23 PM
  • Vegan Jughead: Thanks DCR!  That's awesome news.
    August 17, 2017, 06:11:20 PM
  • DeCarlo Rules: You won't have to wait longer than next Wednesday, Vegan. The Best of Josie is on Diamond's confirmed shipping list for next week.
    August 17, 2017, 02:42:59 PM
  • Vegan Jughead: Good point on the pricing.  The new Josie and the Pussycats trade is only $9.99 and I can't wait for it.  I can't imagine they're moving many digests at retail.  The hardcore geeks like us subscribe but I doubt our numbers are large.
    August 17, 2017, 10:01:49 AM
  • DeCarlo Rules: @Vegan - That investment capital helped pay for Adam Hughes, and printer's bill, plus they resurrected a few of their old cancelled solicits on trade paperbacks that the work had already been completed on.
    August 17, 2017, 09:45:09 AM
  • DeCarlo Rules: I'm going to take a wild guess and say that ARCHIE AND ME DIGEST must contain a new 20-page story. But why wouldn't they advertise that fact? It's baffling trying to guess what they're thinking.
    August 17, 2017, 09:37:32 AM
  • DeCarlo Rules: So Double Digests are 160 pages for $5.99, but ARCHIE AND ME DIGEST is 128 pages for $6.99? Yet somehow a 416-page trade paperback is priced at $9.99?? Or $12.99 for 104 pages of Adam Hughes reprints. I guess they must be using the old "dart-board pricing" method!
    August 17, 2017, 09:28:34 AM
  • Vegan Jughead: Archie November 2017 solicitations: Digests are up to $5.99!  Annuals are $6.99 so I guess Jumbos will be $7.99?  No one is paying that.  Subscribe or don't bother.  [link]
    August 17, 2017, 08:32:09 AM
  • Vegan Jughead: DCR and Downloader, remember they also got that investment capital last year.  I think it was for a few hundred thousand dollars.  I don't know how long that will last, but I'm sure they're using that.
    August 17, 2017, 06:46:26 AM
  • BettyReggie: I saw the November 2017 Solicitations. Fiona Staples is doing a few covers. I can't wait to see what they look like though because they didn't show them yet.
    August 17, 2017, 06:06:23 AM


Author Topic: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?  (Read 2557 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SAGG

Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« on: March 22, 2017, 07:02:50 PM »

It's hilarious! It talks about the "lust-filled" Archie comics of the 70's...  :2funny:


http://flashbak.com/the-lust-filled-pages-of-archie-comics-in-the-1970s-18105/

Vegan Jughead

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2017, 07:18:31 PM »

It's hilarious! It talks about the "lust-filled" Archie comics of the 70's...  :2funny:


http://flashbak.com/the-lust-filled-pages-of-archie-comics-in-the-1970s-18105/

I hadn't!  Looks great.  Thanks!

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2017, 07:26:00 AM »
I'll check that out from home.
Pie is my favorite Vitamin.

DeCarlo Rules

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2017, 10:30:56 AM »
Wow, why is everything so itty-bitty? I have to wonder what these people are constructing these web sites on. It's just a pain to have to hit Ctrl+ multiple times, but I wonder what the creator was viewing the site on?

My favorite was this line. New theory on "What's the deal with Jughead?":
Quote
Of all the guys associated with Archie, Jughead was the most reserved in his horniness.  Perhaps it was the weed that killed his sex drive.  I don’t know.  But he still had his moments.

This guy had the right idea, though. The whole site focuses on an aspect of Archie Comics of the past that was really great, that I miss in the more toned-down stories of ACP's "modern era" (1987-2015). They were clearly tuned-in to one of (if not the) primary appeals of Dan DeCarlo's work, its innocent sexiness, and not afraid to exploit that.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2017, 10:40:49 AM by DeCarlo Rules »

VintageJon

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2017, 02:55:15 PM »
Thanks for sharing that, it was a fun read! 

Mr.Lodge

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2017, 03:05:16 PM »
This is mine..... :2funny:


Quote
Cripes! These guys are literally standing by this woman sweating and panting.  I wonder what we’d see if we could zoom out to get the whole picture.  Synchronized public masturbation is wrong, folks. Keep our beaches clean.
The selected media item is not currently available.

SAGG

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #6 on: March 23, 2017, 06:37:48 PM »


Wow, why is everything so itty-bitty? I have to wonder what these people are constructing these web sites on. It's just a pain to have to hit Ctrl+ multiple times, but I wonder what the creator was viewing the site on?

My favorite was this line. New theory on "What's the deal with Jughead?":
Quote
Of all the guys associated with Archie, Jughead was the most reserved in his horniness.  Perhaps it was the weed that killed his sex drive.  I don’t know.  But he still had his moments.

This guy had the right idea, though. The whole site focuses on an aspect of Archie Comics of the past that was really great, that I miss in the more toned-down stories of ACP's "modern era" (1987-2015). They were clearly tuned-in to one of (if not the) primary appeals of Dan DeCarlo's work, its innocent sexiness, and not afraid to exploit that.


My favorite line was this one:
"Even the gay population at Riverdale can’t help but whistle at a miniskirt.  Truly, this is a land where gawking and pawing at females is not only accepted, but a way of life."
The writer comically assumed that just because the dudes were dressed the way they were, they were gay!  :2funny:


Quick question, DR: Why did you say the pictures were so small?  ???  They're quite large on my screen....
« Last Edit: March 23, 2017, 06:53:29 PM by SAGG »

DeCarlo Rules

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2017, 04:36:13 AM »


Wow, why is everything so itty-bitty? I have to wonder what these people are constructing these web sites on. It's just a pain to have to hit Ctrl+ multiple times, but I wonder what the creator was viewing the site on?

Quick question, DR: Why did you say the pictures were so small?  ???  They're quite large on my screen....

When I first looked at the link on my computer at home, the pictures looked normal-sized (that is to say, they looked like they were displayed on my screen at the pixel height and width at which they'd been scanned), BUT the text was displayed in really tiny fonts, and the whole page had a huge amount of gray space on either side of the page. I just now looked at it again, on a different computer, and the fonts are displayed in a nice readable size (if not a little larger than necessary), BUT the images as displayed are also blown up to the same relative proportions (you can tell they're larger than the original image size as scanned, because you can see dithering, or fuzziness in the colors).

Or maybe I'm mis-remembering and I did originally look at the page on this computer and the fonts displayed as tiny (and I subsequently used Ctrl++ to enlarge the whole page as displayed, but have since forgotten this, although my computer would remember this so I wouldn't need to use the Ctrl+ again).

AND I don't know what kind of screen display you're viewing the page on. It might look perfectly normal, say, on a 9"-diagonal tablet, while I'm looking at the site on a 11.75"x18" monitor with a default display resolution of 1050x1680.

Normally the hypertext (HTML) that the creator used to create the page should dictate some things about how the page displays, scaling both the fonts and images according to both the screen dimensions and pixel resolution native to the computer on which it's being viewed. For example, you sometimes find older web pages created a long time ago before larger monitors and higher screen display resolutions became common, that don't account for these things in the HTML code used to create the page, when scaling the images and fonts, or whether the text is justified or centered, or aligned to right or left.

Not all simple questions are as simple as they might at first appear!  :)
« Last Edit: March 25, 2017, 05:05:44 AM by DeCarlo Rules »

SAGG

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2017, 06:14:52 AM »
And knowing is half the battle! G.I. Archiiiiiiiiiie....  :2funny:

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2017, 02:55:10 AM »
Can someone share what issue this is in and the strip name?
Does anyone have it?
I remember reading this as a kid!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DeCarlo Rules

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2017, 10:45:07 AM »
That's one of the earliest stories featuring Frankie Valdez, isn't it?

60sBettyandReggie

  • Guest
Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2017, 11:20:52 AM »
Can someone share what issue this is in and the strip name?
Does anyone have it?
I remember reading this as a kid!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I read that story a few weeks ago. Name of the story is Sacrifice Play (Archie's Girls Betty and Veronica 214)
It's not Frankie Valdez, it's some other guy Betty was going out with.

SAGG

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2017, 06:09:39 PM »

Can someone share what issue this is in and the strip name?
Does anyone have it?
I remember reading this as a kid!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I read that story a few weeks ago. Name of the story is Sacrifice Play (Archie's Girls Betty and Veronica 214)
It's not Frankie Valdez, it's some other guy Betty was going out with.
Sooo, Ronica was making a play for a guy Betty was going with? Will wonders never cease?  :2funny:

60sBettyandReggie

  • Guest
Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2017, 06:46:14 PM »

Can someone share what issue this is in and the strip name?
Does anyone have it?
I remember reading this as a kid!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I read that story a few weeks ago. Name of the story is Sacrifice Play (Archie's Girls Betty and Veronica 214)
It's not Frankie Valdez, it's some other guy Betty was going out with.
Sooo, Ronica was making a play for a guy Betty was going with? Will wonders never cease?  :2funny:


 ;D ...well, actually Veronica didn't like the guy Betty was going out with. Her sixth sense was telling her there was something fishy about him. And she was right. He was just using Betty to get to Ronnie because of her money (Ronnie took the guy away from Betty so he wouldn't continue lying to her and using her. Ronnie then gave the guy the boot (literally!).

Re: Has Anybody Been To This Archie Site?
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2017, 09:13:30 PM »
Can someone share what issue this is in and the strip name?
Does anyone have it?
I remember reading this as a kid!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I read that story a few weeks ago. Name of the story is Sacrifice Play (Archie's Girls Betty and Veronica 214)
It's not Frankie Valdez, it's some other guy Betty was going out with.

Thanks for the heads up!!
I also know it was in a digest from the 90s but I can't remember which !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 


The Archie character names and likenesses are covered by the registered trademarks/copyrights of Archie Comic Publications, Inc. and are used with permission by this site. The Official Archie Comics website can be visited at www.archiecomics.com.
Live Support