Archie Comics Fan Forum
Everything Archie => All About Archie => Topic started by: Archiecomicxfan215 on October 30, 2017, 06:49:01 PM
My boyfriend showed me this
(https://www.archiefans.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi63.tinypic.com%2F2hhokd0.png&hash=d17c721ec12e7c1ff2383036017c3fe5d594ca44)
What do you all think? :/
I think I'm glad they went the direction they did!
They already made a middle-aged Archie movie... TO RIVERDALE AND BACK AGAIN in 1990, even though it didn't involve time travel. Why do essentially the same thing again? Adding the time-travel angle isn't enough to make middle-aged Archie all that interesting, and that would imply that the series was targeting an entirely different audience. It doesn't really matter that the actors in the 1990 movie may have aged a little better than Louis C.K., or even if they were a few years younger. If they wanted something like that, they should have just done some sort of loosely-adapted LIFE WITH ARCHIE>