Welcome to Archie Comics Fan Forum. Please login or sign up.

March 28, 2024, 07:40:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

Shoutbox

Mar 10 2024 11:04pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "Catnapped!" from Betty and Veronica: Friends Forever: Sleepover: https://riverdalereviewed.wordpress.com/2024/03/10/comics-catnapped/

Mar 03 2024 2:17pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "Winners and Losers" from Betty and Veronica #103: https://riverdalereviewed.wordpress.com/2024/03/03/comics-winners-losers/

Mar 03 2024 2:17pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "Winners

Feb 25 2024 6:02pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "Girl of His Dreams" from Betty and Veronica #101: https://riverdalereviewed.wordpress.com/2024/02/25/comics-girl-of-his-dreams/

Feb 22 2024 5:46pm
Tuxedo Mark: Huh, and apparently World of Betty and Veronica Digest isn't canceled; it just went on a long hiatus: https://archiecomics.com/new-archie-comics-coming-in-may-2024/

Feb 22 2024 5:35pm
Tuxedo Mark: Archie Comics is starting to do $4.99 floppies: https://archiecomics.com/archie-horror-unleashes-apocalyptic-thrills-in-judgment-day/

Feb 17 2024 3:19pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "The Big Victory" from Betty and Veronica #99: https://riverdalereviewed.wordpress.com/2024/02/17/comics-the-big-victory/

Feb 04 2024 4:25pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "Makeover for a Moose" from Betty and Veronica Jumbo Comics Digest #321: https://riverdalereviewed.wordpress.com/2024/02/04/comics-makeover-for-a-moose/

Jan 27 2024 5:44pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "Love is a Football Field!" from Archie Jumbo Comics Digest #347: https://riverdalereviewed.wordpress.com/2024/01/27/comics-love-is-a-football-field/

Jan 25 2024 4:30pm
Tuxedo Mark: My review of "One Shot Worth a Million" from World of Archie Jumbo Comics Digest #136: https://riverdalereviewed.wordpress.com/2024/01/25/comics-one-shot-worth-a-million/

Why I prefer the new Jughead title over the new Archie Title

Started by HarryLuceyFan, April 08, 2016, 11:23:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

daren

Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on May 16, 2016, 05:01:30 PM
Quote from: daren on May 16, 2016, 04:04:12 PM

Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on May 16, 2016, 04:13:01 AM
Quote from: daren on May 16, 2016, 03:38:25 AM
Not so much the novelty wearing off (though, it helped) as the series not living up to the promise of the first couple of issues. It seemed like big things would happen with the Lodge corporation moving in and Archie and his friends trying to get jobs working for them, I thought they would all become more and more involved with that. There should be some exciting development like that to carry the action through and the main five need something that brings them together, they're more interesting as a unit. Instead the stories are just rambling on from one character to another and I find myself not caring about anyone very much...and some of the characterization from the classic stories doesn't work. It's okay for classic Archie to be accident prone without showing that he's, you know, on meds or getting some other professional help, because it's not done realistically. This comic IS realistic and he and his parents just come across as so irresponsible for not reining him in.  :P

Call it what you will. Some of the initial bloom is off the rose as people seem to be beginning to take a closer critical evaluation of the reboot and various details about how the individual aspects of art and story (especially) relate to the whole. Your criticisms being different than mine (or others') notwithstanding. I think there was just a groundswell of initial enthusiasm that carried a lot of readers along that blinded them to some details about exactly how things were working (or not, as may be the case) with the reboot. The "decompressed storytelling" certainly delayed that assessment on a lot of readers' parts.

Good observations.



I'm still hoping a little that Mark Waid can salvage, but I doubt it. There was an article says he doesn't have an overall plan for this series, it shows.


Other characterizations that don't work: spoiled screaming Veronica who was sometimes awesome in the classic stories that way but comes across like she is almost mentally disabled here without explaining it, she's had her moments now and then but thats probably as much me wanting to like her as her being likable. Obnoxious social climbing Mr. Mantle is a terrible idea, if they wanted to make one of the Mantles a bad parent or jerk why not Mrs. Mantle? We know less about her and for ONCE they could have one of the mothers be less nice than the fathers. Mr. Lodge isn't half as complex as he was in the classic stories. Of course Waid could be lulling us into taking their villainy for granted planning to spring surprise character revelations for them later but let's face it, this series probably isn't going to last long enough for that, their creepness is so entrenched now.


The idea of filling in some background detail on the parents is a good one in general, as that's an area where the classic stories are famously vague (and changeable to suit whatever circumstances a specific story required). What, exactly, IS it that Fred Andrews, Hal Cooper, and Forsythe Jones (a.k.a. Jonesy) do for a living, anyway? I mean, of ALL the parents in the classic stories, only ONE has a very specific occupation/career -- Ricky Mantle, newspaper publisher.  It's a detail of those other characters that hardly ever comes into play except in the vaguest sort of way. Fred Andrews... doesn't he work in an office or something? Well, it's not too specific, but I guess it eliminates a lot of career possibilities. But what does he DO in that office every day, and what sort of business does he work for? It's never really gone into beyond some stories where something non-specific like "Andrews, where are those reports?! I need them TODAY!!" comes up in the plot. Mr. Lodge is "a businessman" and a millionaire, but what is the nature of his business, and how did he make his fortune? The latter is never really answered in classic stories, and the former is changeable to suit whatever type of business is relevant to the plot of a specific story. In effect, Lodge owns any and every type of business enterprise imaginable, without limits, and businesses that he is involved in unsuspected to the general reader of Archie Comics can show up at any time that it makes an interesting story connection. Since we don't know what type of business office Fred Andrews works in, or what he really does there, why NOT say that the office he works for is one of Mr. Lodge's companies? It's an interesting wrinkle.


Well Mr. Mantle and Coach Clayton, maybe you just meant the main five though. Yeah in the reboot why not have Mr. Andrews work for Mr. Lodge, although like invisifan said it wouldnt fit classic Archie.

Quote
One thing that bugs me a little is that whenever there's some new take on ARCHIE, Mr. Lodge gets a crap deal as some kind of sinister manipulative power-monger, or at the very least, his motives and character are suspect and questionable. It's happened to one degree or another in To Riverdale and Back Again, The Married Life, and now the reboot. That's the complete reverse of classic Archie, in which Hiram Lodge is almost uniformly shown to be the type of millionaire business magnate who is smart but fair, honest and of unimpeachable character. He's a good father, gives back to the community, helps out the younger generation (even if he sometimes takes a dim view of some of them as individuals). Often the classic stories show some situation in which the kids point out some way his business is negatively impacting the community, and he always takes corrective action to resolve the problem once he's made aware of it, because he cares. He's not one of those cold unfeeling types who feels himself above everyone, despite the obvious gap in wealth. He's never shown as motivated by pure greed or underhanded in his dealings with anyone.


There's also Afterlife, and the new tv show where he'll be in prison. He was the villain in the new look book "My Father's Betrayal" too. I think he has more flaws than you said but yeah, he's much more good than bad, a long way from how all those recent titles and live action tv shows make him.  :P

Quote
Most of the few stories that show Mr. Mantle seem to portray him as a journalist of integrity, as well as good character. It's a bit facile to turn him into a sly schemer in order to try to draw some parallels with his son's many character faults.


Yeah it's not believable. If they wanted to give him hidden faults under his usual self that would work but turning him into a loud caricature doesn't make sense.

The Archie character names and likenesses are covered by the registered trademarks/copyrights of Archie Comic Publications, Inc. and are used with permission by this site. The Official Archie Comics website can be visited at www.archiecomics.com.