Quote from: invisifan on May 23, 2016, 10:05:33 AMQuote from: DeCarlo Rules on May 23, 2016, 05:58:56 AMThe whole cartoon reality thing (as you define it — I'd really look for a different term though, that one's taken) applied to comics in general until the Silver Age when Marvel especially, and DC more hesitantly, began to do footnotes & backrefs to establish continuity ... Archie was just a little late to the game ... and DC frequently branded soon of their better stories which would have substantially changed the status quo as "imaginary" (where later they'd get an "Elseworlds" brand) ...Quote from: daren on May 23, 2016, 03:57:06 AM
It's true. I wish we could have both but classic somewhat discontinuous Archie is way more important.
I forgot to add that after the 1987 volume 2 'soft reboot' (so soft it went undetected by most readers apart from the numbering), continuity was not only allowed but seemingly encouraged. Yet even so, ACP didn't totally abandon the earlier flexibility of cartoon reality, so in a way, you got the benefits of both, by not applying the idea of 'continuity' TOO strictly -- but this period is where you first began to see footnotes acknowledging the events of previous stories.
Note, for example, that this is the period where stories too at-variance with 'standard Archie' became specifically delineated as "fictional" -- a play put on by The Mighty Archie Art Players, where previously, the exact same type of story (taking place in another time period, or parodying a movie or book) would have just appeared with no attempt to justify their anomalous nature.
No. Archie's "reality" was always more loosely defined than DC's (and pre-Marvel Timely/Atlas). Not so much because of continuity, but because Archie was always more of a cartoon character, as opposed to DC and Marvel's adventure characters. Would Batman and Robin, for example, in 1958 appear in a story where (for no reason ever even attempted to explain) they are suddenly dressing and acting like beatniks? No, that gets accepted by readers of Archie comics at that time, because it's a cartoon. There's no need to explain why. Just like for no reason the Archie gang could appear in a story where (again, no attempt at ANY explanation) they are living in ancient Roman times. THAT is cartoon reality. Y'know, like Bugs Bunny.