Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on July 09, 2017, 06:02:21 AM
Digests don't register in sales for comic book shops, which is why there's no sales data for them, which comes only from Diamond Comics' statistics. The vast majority of those digests are being sold NOT in comic shops, but at various retail outlets, or direct from ACP through subscriptions, and there is no sales data from those methods of distribution that is available to the public. On the other hand, Diamond's sales statistics for floppy comics reliably account for more than 90% of ALL sales of printed copies.
Maybe I guess the reason Diamond doesn't add Digests into their stats is because they think Digest are just relics of the past for which they are.
Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on July 09, 2017, 06:02:21 AMBETTY AND VERONICA #1 sold very well in July 2016. It sold 70,830 copies according to Diamond's sales data. B&V #2 didn't do nearly as well as #1 in November 2016, selling only 19,794 copies. STILL much better than ARCHIE #20, though... But that is a massive drop in sales from one issue to the next. We don't yet have sales data for B&V #3, which arrived in comic shops only last month, but I'll bet I can guess that it sold less than #2. We also need to take into account that B&V was a massively expensive comic book title for ACP to produce... by ACP's standards. There was a HUGE amount of overhead cost in hiring Adam Hughes. There doesn't seem to be much point in speculating about the future of that title, since we already know that issue #3 was the last to be written & drawn by Adam Hughes. No issue #4 has yet been solicited by ACP (and may never be). Certainly the lack of Adam Hughes would affect future sales in a negative direction, so who could predict whether this could still be a viable reboot?
Woah,Good point I guess the series remain in hiatus because Adam is done with the series.At least Rachael Stott is in charge of the series even though we don't see the sneak preview of her version of Betty and Veronica