Pretty much everyone at Central High seems to be overly jerky. I've lost track of how many one-off Central High students have caused trouble for Riverdale's finest.

... or Pembrooke Academy (particularly Jason's friend Cedric)

Quote from: The Bee on April 10, 2016, 09:51:39 AM
I am going with the nasty scheming Alexandra Cabot who always seems out for revenge

She just needs love. She NEVER gets to date anyone! She's just bitter, but it's kind of hard to blame her. Not only does she never get a date, she NEVER wins, either -- not even temporarily. She's nowhere near as bad in the comics as she is in the Hanna-Barbera cartoon. I know, she could be nicer to people. Actually, she doesn't seem as bad as Alex in some of the early stories.

Archie because he keeps stringing Betty and Veronica along.

Quote from: PTF on April 10, 2016, 04:09:03 PM
How can I forget? Nick St. Clair the baddest of the bad.

Was he ever in any other stories beyond BBT and the one sequel story in B&V? I'd pretty much agree with this though. There may have been a few nastier one-shot characters, but Nick's the most substantial of the ones who made more than one appearance.

Quote from: irishmoxie on April 10, 2016, 05:00:00 PM
Archie because he keeps stringing Betty and Veronica along.

AND still tries to date anyone else that catches his eye — which is most anyone in a bikini ...

Fred Mirth from Life with Archie. He was actually a criminal. He almost sent Reggie to Prison.

Archie.
Biggest jerkiest jerk.

Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on April 10, 2016, 04:56:52 PM

Quote from: The Bee on April 10, 2016, 09:51:39 AM
I am going with the nasty scheming Alexandra Cabot who always seems out for revenge

She just needs love. She NEVER gets to date anyone! She's just bitter, but it's kind of hard to blame her. Not only does she never get a date, she NEVER wins, either -- not even temporarily. She's nowhere near as bad in the comics as she is in the Hanna-Barbera cartoon. I know, she could be nicer to people. Actually, she doesn't seem as bad as Alex in some of the early stories.

She never does come out on the top which I think pisses her off even more which then gets her intelligence going(which I think she does have)into scheming more things against Josie and the Pussycats. I just think she is a very bitter character against Josie and the Pussycats because they have achieved success and in her own mind she feels she should be apart of that.

Quote from: HarryLuceyFan on April 10, 2016, 10:01:34 AM
Um, Jon Goldwater? 

Great answer!!

From the little I have read I would go with Archie because of the way he treats girls. To be honest I don't see why both Betty and Veronica like him so much.

Quote from: The Bee on April 10, 2016, 05:51:44 PM

Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on April 10, 2016, 04:56:52 PM

Quote from: The Bee on April 10, 2016, 09:51:39 AM
I am going with the nasty scheming Alexandra Cabot who always seems out for revenge

She just needs love. She NEVER gets to date anyone! She's just bitter, but it's kind of hard to blame her. Not only does she never get a date, she NEVER wins, either -- not even temporarily. She's nowhere near as bad in the comics as she is in the Hanna-Barbera cartoon. I know, she could be nicer to people. Actually, she doesn't seem as bad as Alex in some of the early stories.

She never does come out on the top which I think pisses her off even more which then gets her intelligence going(which I think she does have)into scheming more things against Josie and the Pussycats. I just think she is a very bitter character against Josie and the Pussycats because they have achieved success and in her own mind she feels she should be apart of that.

In the She's Josie stories she rarely appears and is more snobbish than outright mean like she can be in the 'Pussycats' stories. In fact, before she does anything remotely mean in her first appearances, Josie is the one to tell the audience she is a "witch." She spends most of her first appearance giving Albert (Josie's kinda-boyfriend at the time) a make-over and acting pretty nice to him. Then at the end he takes advantage of that and tries to get with Josie right in front of her (which results in the first actual cruel thing she does - but Albert deserves it - throws him off a bridge into the water). As the series progressed, she became more aggressive and sneaky/mean like Alex was in the early stories (and still can be - depending on who is writing him). In the cartoon, she was made into the evil twin, and Alex was just Shaggy with sunglasses and an ego.

I don't know about the whole "oh she just needs a boyfriend to calm her down/she needs someone nice like Alan" because to me it implies a man can fix out-of-control women. (It's like when they gave Cheryl a boyfriend --- the mean girl just needs a man in her life!)  Would anyone suggest that about Reggie or Alex? I haven't really seen it, though Reggie seems a lot calmer when Betty is the one going out with him in the comic stories.

I mean on one hand there are  A LOT of stories where someone pretends to be interested in her and she gets really happy and blindly clings onto that person who will tell the audience "It's that Cabot girl! I want her money so I will pretend to like her! I'm a gold digger!" So having someone who loves her would help. But on the other hand, there are a lot of stories where she will have absolutely no interest in getting a  boyfriend (especially when her father tries to set her up with one). And here is where I think is the source of her jealousy - her life is being controlled by her name (Cabot). Alex is allowed to run off and chase girls and make a fool of himself, but we see that Alexandra has a lot less freedom and is more concerned about the Cabot name.

The one thing that is consistent with Alexandra is that she is incredibly over-confident (or she likes to present herself as such) - so yeah, never coming out on top appears to bruise her ego. I find it interesting/funny that she automatically presumes Alan/Albert/Clyde/etc find her more appealing than Josie. Another consistent thing I noticed in the comics is that when she lets all her defensive walls down (mostly when they're not playing a gig or when the boys aren't around) she can be really kind but doesn't know how to show her good intentions right. Also she cares about animals and old people (she loves Sebastian despite her temper with him - but he trolls her a lot sooo...also there are like 2 or 3 stories where she sheds tears over the death/plight of the elderly).

I dunno, for me it's fun to over-think her character because she is so full of contradictions and it's equally fun to think about how each writer treats her a bit differently. ((Like, is she flat-out evil or more sympathetic.)) You can make up a lot of reasons why she's often so insanely jealous of Josie and they would probably all make sense.

She's rich. She beautiful. She can be mean and vindictive. She feels she's entitled. She thinks she deserves to have it all.

Now for all of the above, I could be talking about Cheryl Blossom or Veronica Lodge. What do they have that Alexandra Cabot doesn't? Well, they know that boys find them desirable and want to be with them, and not just for their money - but not Alexandra. She's lonely. What does she think about when she's alone with her thoughts? Does she spend the entire time scheming and planning ways of revenge? Not exactly.That's what everyone thinks, because they just remember the animated cartoon, where that's practically ALL she ever did. Take the following example. It might as well have been recycled from an old script from the 1950s, with Alexandra playing the part of Betty and Alan M. playing the part of Archie. Yeah, at times it seems like Alexandra might be a fusion of the scheming, frustrated Betty of the 1950s, combined with the spiteful, egotistical Veronica of the 1970s. After this page, she probably went home to write her private fantasies in "Alexandra's Diary".


When she tries to be part of the group, and get along with people, does anyone remember that? Not really.

When Josie gets possessed by an evil spirit, who saves the day? Was it Alex? Alan M? No wait, it had to be Valerie, right? Nope, it's Alexandra who takes charge and does what needs to get done.



Yes, she even has feelings like other people do.

You'd think maybe once or twice, somebody might actually really like her (not for her money) or give her a break and go out with her on a date.
BUT IT NEVER HAPPENS. The worst part is, that deep down Alexandra realizes this and that she's doomed to be the villain because it's the part that's been written for her in life. She'll never really be allowed to win, not even a little. Futility piled upon frustration. She's stuck right where she was in the earliest issues, fated to lose and have people cheer about it. Other people's happy endings are Alexandra's misery. It's a never-ending cycle, because unless something positive were to happen for Alexandra, she's forced to seek attention in all the BAD ways. The only thing she can really do about it is refuse to be ignored. They say that money can't buy happiness, but it never stopped Veronica or Cheryl from getting what they wanted. Sometimes they lose, but sometimes they win too. Only poor Alexandra has to go through life unwanted and unloved.

Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on April 22, 2016, 05:12:42 PM
She's rich. She beautiful. She can be mean and vindictive. She feels she's entitled. She thinks she deserves to have it all.

Now for all of the above, I could be talking about Cheryl Blossom or Veronica Lodge. What do they have that Alexandra Cabot doesn't? Well, they know that boys find them desirable and want to be with them, and not just for their money - but not Alexandra. She's lonely. What does she think about when she's alone with her thoughts? Does she spend the entire time scheming and planning ways of revenge? Not exactly.That's what everyone thinks, because they just remember the animated cartoon, where that's practically ALL she ever did. Take the following example. It might as well have been recycled from an old script from the 1950s, with Alexandra playing the part of Betty and Alan M. playing the part of Archie. Yeah, at times it seems like Alexandra might be a fusion of the scheming, frustrated Betty of the 1950s, combined with the spiteful, egotistical Veronica of the 1970s. After this page, she probably went home to write her private fantasies in "Alexandra's Diary".


When she tries to be part of the group, and get along with people, does anyone remember that? Not really.

When Josie gets possessed by an evil spirit, who saves the day? Was it Alex? Alan M? No wait, it had to be Valerie, right? Nope, it's Alexandra who takes charge and does what needs to get done.



Yes, she even has feelings like other people do.

You'd think maybe once or twice, somebody might actually really like her (not for her money) or give her a break and go out with her on a date.
BUT IT NEVER HAPPENS. The worst part is, that deep down Alexandra realizes this and that she's doomed to be the villain because it's the part that's been written for her in life. She'll never really be allowed to win, not even a little. Futility piled upon frustration. She's stuck right where she was in the earliest issues, fated to lose and have people cheer about it. Other people's happy endings are Alexandra's misery. It's a never-ending cycle, because unless something positive were to happen for Alexandra, she's forced to seek attention in all the BAD ways. The only thing she can really do about it is refuse to be ignored. They say that money can't buy happiness, but it never stopped Veronica or Cheryl from getting what they wanted. Sometimes they lose, but sometimes they win too. Only poor Alexandra has to go through life unwanted and unloved.

I missed this when you posted it. I've been dying to write an entire thing about her character but you summed it up nicely.

...And now I'm sad(der) for Alexandra.

Everyone at Central High. A school filled entirely with cheaters.