Quote from: DeCarlo Rules on May 27, 2017, 12:01:47 AMQuote from: naaee on May 26, 2017, 12:04:40 PMQuote from: DeCarlo Rules on May 26, 2017, 01:39:27 AMand what is that flaw ( nonsense idiot ) ? that there was no father before your birth ?( just see the fun ) is that is what which makes sense to you ? then you are idiot. you are nothing but an hypocrite idiot than. that is it.
Yeah, I notice you don't have any real answers either. I guess that makes us even.
If you weren't there when it happened or you don't remember it happening, then you don't know any more than anyone else.
It's all speculation, which makes my guesses as good as yours. Belief and truth aren't the same, but there's more than one of each.
Your father analogy is flawed because it's based on an assumed anthropocentic viewpoint. Who is the father? Stars... that's where most elements are formed, in the heart of nuclear reactors. Then how are stars born? There are several theories, but none definitive, so no one knows[/b. Not unlike theories of creators, in fact -- exactly the same. We have some ideas, just like we have some intelligence, but we don't know everything, and we admit we don't know everything. Believers who believe can claim to know more, but I would require proof, not questions and analogies to back up claims that your belief is authoritative.
You claim answers to questions for which no proof is available. Challenges that attempt to point out someone's ignorance are worthless, because we're aware of not knowing the answers to questions. Proving a lack of knowledge proves nothing in contrast to that lack of knowledge. Theories are just theories, no matter how convinced someone is of them. If it works for you then fine, be happy in your own beliefs. You don't need to harass anyone else with the presumed superiority of your belief system.
and no saying that there is no proof that there is no father before your birth. and you were dropped from the sky into the womb of your mother. that is not possible. ( rascal idiot )
You appear to be a very angry and arrogant person, naaee.
Certainly asexual reproduction is possible. It's called parthenogenesis -- you can look it up. That doesn't address the basic question of how you know what you think you know, if you have no direct memory or sensory experience of it, though.
Assuming for a moment, just for the sake of discussion, a created universe with a creator, how can you know whether the universe came into existence one trillion years ago, or one second ago, created exactly as it exists right now? You can't. We can accept the fact that there are things that we don't know as proven, and that there are things that we will probably never know or understand. Some people believe that indicates the existence of a creator who is so omnipotent and omniscient that its nature will always surpass our understanding. But it really isn't necessary to invoke a theoretical creator to simply admit that there are things that surpass our understanding, and some things that probably always will.
and weather there is any connection or not you can understand it for it is already explained. but you deny that there is any father before your birth. you are that intelligent idiot. for you are the dropped from the sky into the womb of your mother.
so what is meaning in beating that horse ? who is already dead. ( simply waste of time )